Climate shocks, funding gaps and demographic shifts, test public bodies. Embedding ERM supports stability and long-term resilience.
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

Author: Tilden Watson

null

Market landscape

By 2028, local government in the UK will look radically different. Local government reorganisation will redraw boundaries, powers will devolve further to mayoral authorities, and a review of local government finance is already underway1. These can bring positive change, but they also sharpen the risks; financial, operational, and reputational, that public bodies must navigate.

The housing sector is already feeling the strain. Ambitious targets under the Planning and Infrastructure Bill, combined with new energy and safety standards, place councils under pressure to deliver more with fewer resources. Education, too, faces turbulence: post-COVID learning loss, competition for places, and research funding constraints threaten long-term stability. Yet, moments of reform also bring opportunity. These shifts give local authorities the chance to modernise, rethink how services are delivered, and build models that are more resilient for the future.

Each sector is different, yet all are bound by the same truth: the public sector is working at the front line of a volatile, uncertain, complex and ambiguous (VUCA) environment.

Wider insight on risk in the public sector

When you step back, the pressures facing councils and public bodies are part of a wider set of trends. The World Economic Forum2 highlights climate shocks, demographic shifts, and technological disruption as defining global risks. In fact, 75% of those risks map directly onto the UK public sector.

Demographics are a prime example. An aging population is driving up demand for adult social care, which now consumes the majority of many councils’ budgets3. As funding is squeezed, more authorities face the risk of issuing Section 114 notices. This trend is already visible and will accelerate without long-term planning for sustainable care models.

Energy reliability is another: the National Risk Register4 highlights our dependence on the National Grid, raising difficult questions about resilience if rare, high impact events occur. Even low-likelihood risks like severe space weather or nuclear miscalculation are not abstract, they test the robustness of frontline services on which millions depend.

In short, risk is no longer a theoretical concept. It is woven into the daily delivery of services. However, recognising these risks early allows organisations to plan differently, invest smarter, and create resilience before the pressure point is reached.

Emerging themes

Comparing global, national and sector-specific risks to highlight the pressures confronting local government:

WEF report (top risks over two years) National Risk Register 20254 Gallagher risk barometer5
Misinformation and disinformation Pandemic Financial sustainability
Extreme weather events Severe space weather Cyber threat
State-based armed conflict Low temperatures and snow Emerging Govt policy
Societal polarisation Emerging infectious disease Capacity and resource
Cyber threats Nuclear miscalculation Social Care challenges

 

These risks aren’t confined to future horizons; they are already reshaping decision making across the public sector.

How does ERM help?

With vital services at stake, there is now a clear expectation that Enterprise Risk Management should be embedded at every level. ERM provides a way to translate this web of risks into a framework that can be managed. More importantly, it enables organisations to break out of crisis-response mode and take a proactive structured approach to risk.

ERM builds consensus across leadership teams, clarifies risk appetite, and communicates a consistent message to stakeholders. At a time when confidence and trust are as critical as budgets, ERM is one of the few tools that can anchor stability.

The Gallagher approach

At Gallagher, we see these challenges every day. Our risk barometer makes clear the scale of the challenge: 52% of risks currently faced by local government are rated “red”, beyond appetite and signalling urgent concern. Financial sustainability, capacity pressures and social care challenges dominate the landscape, reflecting the strain public bodies face in stating essential services. The insights come from extensive sampling of risk registers, benchmarking and sentiment analysis across the sector, giving us a clear evidence-led view of where risks are most acute. This means organisations are not alone in facing these challenges, there is a growing body of insight, experience and support to draw upon.

Our approach is hands-on and collaborative, supporting the sector through:

  • Assurance reviews (health checks): benchmarking, sentiment analysis and process reviews to give leadership teams clarity on risk results
  • Embedding ERM in transition programmes: ensuring the ultimate goals are achieved
  • Shaping risk strategies: helping leadership teams define what success looks like and align the whole organisation behind it

One recent example began with a simple but powerful question from a leadership team: “what do we want to gain from ERM?” That single question shaped the entire strategy and created ownership across the organisation.

Author Information


Sources

1 Closed consultation - The Fair Funding Review 2.0, GOV.UK, 20 June 2025.
2 The Global Risks Report – 20th Edition, World Economic Forum, January 2025. PDF file.
3 Adult Social Care Reform: the cost of inaction, GOV.UK, 5 May 2025.
4 National Risk Register 2025, GOV.UK, 16 January 2025.
5 From the internal only Gallagher Risk Barometer. Sampling of 7 risk registers across Local Government between Quarter 4 2024 and Quarter 2 2025. This provides unique insight to risk approaches and risk views. We utilise this to support customers on their risk journey. Data correct as of September 2025 (this list pertains to Local Government).


Disclaimer

The sole purpose of this article is to provide guidance on the issues covered. This article is not intended to give legal advice, and, accordingly, it should not be relied upon. It should not be regarded as a comprehensive statement of the law and/or market practice in this area. We make no claims as to the completeness or accuracy of the information contained herein or in the links which were live at the date of publication. You should not act upon (or should refrain from acting upon) information in this publication without first seeking specific legal and/or specialist advice. Arthur J. Gallagher Insurance Brokers Limited accepts no liability for any inaccuracy, omission or mistake in this publication, nor will we be responsible for any loss which may be suffered as a result of any person relying on the information contained herein.