The Local Government Reorganisation (LGR) is entering the most critical phase of implementation ahead of April 2028. It will be one of the biggest structural changes English local government has seen in decades.
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
null

The intended benefits are clear, including simpler governance and better service delivery, but they aren't guaranteed. Their success will depend on how well councils manage a complex, multi-layered transition, moving toward unitary structures with new governance and operating models. Progress is likely to vary across areas due to differences in readiness, scale and complexity.

In some early cases shadow authorities are being established, along with interim governance structures and a rise in structured planning. At the same time, coordination is becoming more complex, with these challenges now reflected in day-to-day operational decisions.
Tilden Watson, regional strategic risk advisor, Public Sector, Gallagher

What's making LGR so complex?

Local Government Reorganisation is inherently complex as it involves transformation, aggregation and disaggregation of services. As implementation progresses, some of the pressure points are becoming more obvious, from unclear ownership to structures that don't yet fully align.

Priorities that will shape delivery

To maintain long-term financial and operational stability, clarity will be key. With that in mind, there are some crucial factors to consider:

  • Early mapping. Getting a clear view of contracts and liabilities early on makes a big difference. This provides visibility of potential gaps, overlaps or hidden exposures, reducing the likelihood of costly issues during implementation.
  • Data integrity. Good decisions depend on good data. If information is fragmented across systems or isn't consistent, it becomes harder to get a true picture of assets, liabilities and risk exposure. This can lead to poor assumptions, which then affect financial planning and insurance outcomes.
  • Strategic alignment. Insurance and risk management shouldn't sit separately from the wider transformation. Looking at them alongside governance, financial planning and service delivery helps create a more joined-up approach. This, in turn, makes it easier to understand overall risk and better prepares the organisation for change.

The human side of local government reorganisation

Even with clear plans in place, it's people who will ultimately shape the outcome. Councils are bringing together teams with different cultures and ways of working, which takes time to align.

From the workforce perspective, a few priorities stand out:

  • Retaining skilled staff
  • Managing uncertainty
  • Aligning leadership
  • Preserving knowledge
  • Building a shared culture

Why early risk visibility matters

As implementation progresses, spotting risks early becomes more important. The risks themselves aren't new, but the speed and impact of decisions continue to increase. Without clear processes and data, initial issues can escalate quickly.

Key areas of focus include:

  • Understanding contracts and liabilities at an early stage
  • Improving data quality
  • Aligning risk and insurance strategies
  • Setting clear accountability
  • Supporting staff through change

Case study: Real experience of LGR

Gallagher helps support local authorities through complex LGR transformation programmes, applying a structured, end-to-end approach to insurance and risk.

In one case, we supported the merger of four district councils and a county council into a single unitary authority. The programme was structured across five key stages: strategy development, data consolidation and validation, future-fit coverage design, risk transfer modelling, and market engagement through to implementation.

A big part of the work involved bringing together fragmented data and aligning stakeholders to create a clear, consistent view of risk. We also tested programme structures against future scenarios, so the solution was designed for the new organisation rather than shaped by legacy arrangements.

The outcome extended beyond insurance placement. It delivered cost savings, stronger governance and an insurance programme aligned to the authority's risk profile. Insurance became a strategic tool, supporting more confident decision-making throughout the transition.

How Gallagher can support

In a transformation programme of this scale, insurance and the management of risk plays a central role in enabling the new authority to operate from day one.

Our specialists help support organisations with data-led insight and clarity throughout. From mapping contracts and liabilities to aligning risk and engaging the market, this approach helps build a clear picture of exposure and ensures decisions are based on reliable information.

For more information on how Gallagher can support your organisation, get in touchwith one of our specialists.


Disclaimer

The sole purpose of this article is to provide guidance on the issues covered. This article is not intended to give legal advice, and, accordingly, it should not be relied upon. It should not be regarded as a comprehensive statement of the law and/or market practice in this area. We make no claims as to the completeness or accuracy of the information contained herein or in the links which were live at the date of publication. You should not act upon (or should refrain from acting upon) information in this publication without first seeking specific legal and/or specialist advice. Arthur J. Gallagher Insurance Brokers Limited accepts no liability for any inaccuracy, omission or mistake in this publication, nor will we be responsible for any loss which may be suffered as a result of any person relying on the information contained herein.

Arthur J. Gallagher Insurance Brokers Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Registered Office: Spectrum Building, 55 Blythswood Street, Glasgow, G2 7AT. Registered in Scotland. Company Number: SC108909.